HypothesisVery high confidenceCurrent
Authorization must be enforced before and throughout retrieval and must propagate to embeddings, summaries, inferred edges, caches and action inputs.
Attach effective policy metadata to every projection.
Valid from2026-08-23
Last reviewed2026-08-23
Review again2026-11-21
Dataheart stanceexploring
Evidence for
Derived artifacts can reveal protected information even when raw nodes are hidden.
PoisonedRAG · usenix.org ↗Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Artificial Intelligence Act · eur-lex.europa.eu ↗Retrieval poisoning and indirect instructions exploit content after ingestion.
PoisonedRAG · usenix.org ↗Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Artificial Intelligence Act · eur-lex.europa.eu ↗The AI Act requires logging, transparency and human oversight for applicable high-risk systems.
PoisonedRAG · usenix.org ↗Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Artificial Intelligence Act · eur-lex.europa.eu ↗Evidence against
Policy intersection can over-restrict harmless aggregate or anonymized products.
PoisonedRAG · usenix.org ↗Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Artificial Intelligence Act · eur-lex.europa.eu ↗Fine-grained enforcement increases query latency and operational complexity.
PoisonedRAG · usenix.org ↗Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Artificial Intelligence Act · eur-lex.europa.eu ↗How this claim can fall
Replace this placeholder during human review with an observable result that would materially weaken or falsify the claim.
A published claim remains useful only while it remains possible to prove it wrong.