HypothesisHigh confidenceCurrent
A Microsoft-native profile and a self-hosted/open profile can provide equivalent trust semantics if both conform to a customer-owned canonical evidence model and shared behavioral tests.
Specify semantic equivalence rather than identical implementation.
Valid from2026-08-23
Last reviewed2026-08-23
Review again2026-11-21
Dataheart stanceexploring
Evidence for
Microsoft services expose quality and lineage primitives that map to open conceptual models.
Microsoft Purview Unified Catalog Data Quality · learn.microsoft.com ↗Microsoft Fabric lineage · learn.microsoft.com ↗OpenLineage 1.52.0 release · openlineage.io ↗W3C DCAT Version 3 · w3.org ↗Open standards and projects cover corresponding catalog, contract, lineage and attestation primitives.
Microsoft Purview Unified Catalog Data Quality · learn.microsoft.com ↗Microsoft Fabric lineage · learn.microsoft.com ↗OpenLineage 1.52.0 release · openlineage.io ↗W3C DCAT Version 3 · w3.org ↗Evidence against
Connector coverage, identifier semantics, scoring and retention behavior differ.
Microsoft Purview Unified Catalog Data Quality · learn.microsoft.com ↗Microsoft Fabric lineage · learn.microsoft.com ↗OpenLineage 1.52.0 release · openlineage.io ↗W3C DCAT Version 3 · w3.org ↗Some proprietary runtime details may not be exportable without loss.
Microsoft Purview Unified Catalog Data Quality · learn.microsoft.com ↗Microsoft Fabric lineage · learn.microsoft.com ↗OpenLineage 1.52.0 release · openlineage.io ↗W3C DCAT Version 3 · w3.org ↗How this claim can fall
Replace this placeholder during human review with an observable result that would materially weaken or falsify the claim.
A published claim remains useful only while it remains possible to prove it wrong.