HypothesisVery high confidenceCurrent
The state of the art supports a composable trust stack rather than one standard or platform that fully covers catalog metadata, runtime lineage, quality, metric semantics, authorization and cryptographic evidence.
Dataheart should own the canonical integration model.
Valid from2026-08-23
Last reviewed2026-08-23
Review again2026-11-21
Dataheart stanceexploring
Evidence for
DCAT delegates provenance and quality detail to PROV and DQV.
W3C DCAT Version 3 · w3.org ↗OpenLineage 1.52.0 release · openlineage.io ↗in-toto Attestation Envelope specification · github.com ↗OpenLineage separately models runtime jobs, runs, datasets and facets.
W3C DCAT Version 3 · w3.org ↗OpenLineage 1.52.0 release · openlineage.io ↗in-toto Attestation Envelope specification · github.com ↗Attestation specifications separately model subject, predicate and envelope.
W3C DCAT Version 3 · w3.org ↗OpenLineage 1.52.0 release · openlineage.io ↗in-toto Attestation Envelope specification · github.com ↗Evidence against
Integrated vendor platforms can provide a simpler operational experience inside their supported ecosystem.
W3C DCAT Version 3 · w3.org ↗OpenLineage 1.52.0 release · openlineage.io ↗in-toto Attestation Envelope specification · github.com ↗Composing standards creates adapter, reconciliation and lifecycle-management cost.
W3C DCAT Version 3 · w3.org ↗OpenLineage 1.52.0 release · openlineage.io ↗in-toto Attestation Envelope specification · github.com ↗How this claim can fall
Replace this placeholder during human review with an observable result that would materially weaken or falsify the claim.
A published claim remains useful only while it remains possible to prove it wrong.