HypothesisVery high confidenceCurrent
OCI images and open table formats are necessary portability mechanisms but do not preserve identity, policy, network, catalog, workflow and operational semantics by themselves.
Add semantic, policy, evidence and action export contracts.
Valid from2026-08-23
Last reviewed2026-08-23
Review again2026-11-21
Dataheart stanceexploring
Evidence for
OCI specifies artifact construction and distribution rather than complete platform state.
OCI Image and Distribution Specifications 1.1 release · opencontainers.org ↗Apache Iceberg specification · iceberg.apache.org ↗Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 — Data Act · eur-lex.europa.eu ↗Iceberg documents version and path compatibility concerns.
OCI Image and Distribution Specifications 1.1 release · opencontainers.org ↗Apache Iceberg specification · iceberg.apache.org ↗Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 — Data Act · eur-lex.europa.eu ↗The Data Act separately requires interfaces, metadata, assistance and continuity.
OCI Image and Distribution Specifications 1.1 release · opencontainers.org ↗Apache Iceberg specification · iceberg.apache.org ↗Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 — Data Act · eur-lex.europa.eu ↗Evidence against
Standardized packaging substantially lowers migration cost.
OCI Image and Distribution Specifications 1.1 release · opencontainers.org ↗Apache Iceberg specification · iceberg.apache.org ↗Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 — Data Act · eur-lex.europa.eu ↗A deliberately constrained application can achieve high portability with these standards.
OCI Image and Distribution Specifications 1.1 release · opencontainers.org ↗Apache Iceberg specification · iceberg.apache.org ↗Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 — Data Act · eur-lex.europa.eu ↗How this claim can fall
Replace this placeholder during human review with an observable result that would materially weaken or falsify the claim.
A published claim remains useful only while it remains possible to prove it wrong.