Prompt injection cannot currently be treated as solved by model training, prompting, delimiters, or classifiers alone.
No untrusted content may directly authorize a tool effect.
Evidence for
AgentDojo demonstrates successful attacks and incomplete defenses in tool-using environments.
AgentDojo · proceedings.neurips.cc ↗Defeating Prompt Injections by Design, CaMeL · arxiv.org ↗Bad Memory: Evaluating Prompt Injection Risks from Memory in Agentic Systems · arxiv.org ↗CaMeL argues heuristic defenses lack guarantees and moves enforcement outside the model.
AgentDojo · proceedings.neurips.cc ↗Defeating Prompt Injections by Design, CaMeL · arxiv.org ↗Bad Memory: Evaluating Prompt Injection Risks from Memory in Agentic Systems · arxiv.org ↗Bad Memory demonstrates cross-session influence from planted persistent instructions.
AgentDojo · proceedings.neurips.cc ↗Defeating Prompt Injections by Design, CaMeL · arxiv.org ↗Bad Memory: Evaluating Prompt Injection Risks from Memory in Agentic Systems · arxiv.org ↗Evidence against
AgentDojo default attacks succeed in a minority of cases against its best agents.
AgentDojo · proceedings.neurips.cc ↗Defeating Prompt Injections by Design, CaMeL · arxiv.org ↗Bad Memory: Evaluating Prompt Injection Risks from Memory in Agentic Systems · arxiv.org ↗Detectors and architecture-level controls materially reduce attack success.
AgentDojo · proceedings.neurips.cc ↗Defeating Prompt Injections by Design, CaMeL · arxiv.org ↗Bad Memory: Evaluating Prompt Injection Risks from Memory in Agentic Systems · arxiv.org ↗CaMeL provides scoped guarantees under explicit assumptions.
AgentDojo · proceedings.neurips.cc ↗Defeating Prompt Injections by Design, CaMeL · arxiv.org ↗Bad Memory: Evaluating Prompt Injection Risks from Memory in Agentic Systems · arxiv.org ↗How this claim can fall
Replace this placeholder during human review with an observable result that would materially weaken or falsify the claim.
A published claim remains useful only while it remains possible to prove it wrong.