HypothesisVery high confidenceCurrent
An approve or reject step alone is not evidence of effective human oversight.
Test false-acceptance, fatigue, independence and evidence comprehension.
Valid from2026-08-23
Last reviewed2026-08-23
Review again2026-11-21
Dataheart stanceexploring
Evidence for
EU AI Act requires oversight measures proportionate to risk and autonomy.
EU — Regulation 2024/1689, AI Act · eur-lex.europa.eu ↗Kücking et al. — Automation Bias in AI-Decision Support · pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗Empirical evidence shows false agreement with incorrect AI recommendations.
EU — Regulation 2024/1689, AI Act · eur-lex.europa.eu ↗Kücking et al. — Automation Bias in AI-Decision Support · pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗Evidence against
For simple, familiar and low-volume decisions, standard approvals may be adequate.
EU — Regulation 2024/1689, AI Act · eur-lex.europa.eu ↗Kücking et al. — Automation Bias in AI-Decision Support · pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗How this claim can fall
Replace this placeholder during human review with an observable result that would materially weaken or falsify the claim.
A published claim remains useful only while it remains possible to prove it wrong.